School Improvement Plan
What is a School Improvement Plan?
A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.
Key Points of a SIP:
- Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
- Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
- Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.
Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.
Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.
District - School Improvement Plans

Endeavour Elementary School Improvement Plan
2024-2026
Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities
- What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
- What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
- What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality
ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities.
ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following:
- Institutional racism and ableism
- Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education
- Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)
- Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs
- Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs
- Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education
Reflection & Theory of Action
- What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
- What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
Backed by Data
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.
School-Based Action Plan
Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.
Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c
Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a
Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning. ISD Priority 1
Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b
Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
| Action | Implementation | Impact: Evidence/Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
|
Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy |
Training
Teaming
Integrity of Delivery
Resources Allocation
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling |
Block Scheduling
Learning Resource Center (LRC/Special Education) Supports
Multilanguage Learner (ML) Push-In Services
Leveled Small Groups
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Inclusionary Practices |
Inclusionary Practices Coach
Increase inclusive mindset throughout the building with all staff
Utilize Ignite Team
Integration of Support Services
Note: Block schedule allows services to be more efficient & effective. Students are able to show more growth when integrated with their peers than in a pull-out model. |
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Additional School Improvement Plan Components |
||
|
Family engagement |
Support Staff Participation during Curriculum Night:
Partnering with Highland Gardens
Participation for whole families during PTSA Events
Action: Multiple Modes of Communication
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
Awareness of other staff and roles in the building.
|
|
Technology Integration |
Trainings for Endeavour Staff
Integrity of Delivery
Resources Allocation
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
Resources
|
School Improvement Team & Procedure Information
|
Principal |
Megan Funes |
|---|---|
|
SIP Team Members |
Zach Silva – Kindergarten Teacher Lizzy Herda – 1st grade Teacher Lisa Wells – 2nd grade Teacher Chelsea Wollgast – 3rd grade Teacher Andrei Zotov – 4th grade Teacher Misti Shupe – 4th grade MERLIN Teacher Dorry Nakamura – 5th grade Teacher Caleb Paul – Music Teacher Shandell Baker – Inclusionary Practices Specialist Aly Lamont – Instructional Technology Specialist Agnes Jang – Literacy Implementation Specialist Katie Sabol – Dean of Students Mikayla Rolfs - Counselor |
|
Supervisor Review |
Susan Mundell- November 13, 2024 |
|
Site Council or PTSA Review |
October 4, 2024 & October 25, 2024 |
|
School Board Review |
December 3, 2024 @ 1:00pm |